4 Best Tennis Shoes for Older Men 2025

If you’re looking for maximum comfort on a budget, the CMNZHK Men’s Tennis Shoes deliver an unexpectedly smooth experience for older men who value ease and everyday wearability. These shoes feature a stretchy breathable mesh upper that hugs the foot without constricting, making them ideal for those with slight swelling or wide forefeet—common concerns as we age. The soft EVA midsole provides a pleasantly cushioned feel underfoot, absorbing impact during walks or light gym sessions, while the non-slip rubber sole offers reliable traction on both tile and pavement, reducing fall risk significantly.

In real-world use, these shoes shine during daily errands, light exercise, or extended standing periods—situations where fatigue usually sets in quickly. At just over 10 ounces, their ultra-lightweight design reduces leg strain, a major plus for older users managing joint sensitivity. The slip-on with adjustable laces hybrid design makes them easy to put on without sacrificing support, a thoughtful touch for those with mobility or dexterity limitations. However, they’re not built for intense lateral movements or hard court play—the outsole lacks structured guidance for sharp cuts, and the arch support is minimal compared to performance models.

Compared to higher-end options like the ASICS Game FlyteFoam or New Balance 806, the CMNZHK falls short in long-term durability and motion control, but it outperforms many budget sneakers in breathability and comfort. It’s best suited for retired men or casual walkers who want a versatile, no-fuss shoe that transitions from park strolls to grocery runs without breaking the bank. While it doesn’t match the targeted stability of premium models, its value proposition is hard to ignore when performance needs are moderate.

When cushioning meets responsive stability, the ASICS Men’s Game FlyteFoam Tennis Shoes stand out as a top contender for older men seeking joint-friendly support without sacrificing agility. Engineered with FLYTEFOAM midsole technology, these shoes absorb shock with precision, reducing stress on knees and hips—a game-changer for players or walkers managing arthritis or age-related discomfort. The TRUSSTIC system in the midfoot enhances structural integrity, preventing excessive foot roll during side-to-side movements, which is critical for maintaining balance as reflexes slow with age.

On the court or during brisk walks, the Game FlyteFoam delivers a balanced blend of softness and responsiveness, rebounding with each step rather than feeling mushy like cheaper foams. The mesh upper promotes airflow, keeping feet cool during longer sessions, though it offers less durability than leather alternatives. It handles hard courts and concrete with confidence, but on wet indoor surfaces, the traction can feel slightly less aggressive than specialized tennis outsoles. While not the most supportive option available, it strikes a smart middle ground between lightweight agility and protective cushioning.

Against the New Balance 806, the ASICS trades some lateral rigidity for a softer ride, making it better suited for recreational play or daily wear than competitive match scenarios. Compared to the CMNZHK budget model, it offers superior motion control and material quality, justifying its position as the best for cushioning. Ideal for active older men who play doubles or enjoy fitness walking, these shoes prioritize joint protection and comfort without feeling bulky. They don’t offer the same motion control as the 806, but they beat it in weight and underfoot softness.

For older men who demand maximum stability and medical-grade support, the New Balance 806 V1 is a benchmark in performance-driven design. This shoe is engineered with C-CAP® and ABZORB® cushioning systems working in tandem to deliver rock-solid heel protection and smooth energy transfer, making it ideal for those with overpronation or a history of foot fatigue. The exclusive ROLLBAR technology provides rearfoot posting that actively corrects gait imbalances—offering a level of motion control rarely seen outside orthopedic footwear.

In real-world testing, the 806 excels during prolonged standing, walking, or recreational tennis, where lateral stability is non-negotiable. The full-grain leather upper molds to the foot over time, offering durability and a secure, glove-like fit that resists stretching—perfect for maintaining consistent support. The herringbone outsole grips reliably on clay and hard courts, though it’s equally at home on sidewalks or shopping center floors. That said, the shoe is on the heavier side, which may feel cumbersome for users prioritizing lightweight mobility over structure.

Compared to the ASICS Game FlyteFoam, the 806 offers superior motion control and build quality, but at the cost of added weight and reduced underfoot softness. Against the adidas Grand Court 2.0, it’s in a completely different league—built for performance, not casual style. It’s the best overall choice for older men with foot conditions, flat feet, or those needing Medicare-compliant footwear (HCPCS A5500 eligible). While not the lightest or most stylish, it outperforms others in long-term support and durability.

With its clean aesthetic and plush interior, the adidas Grand Court 2.0 redefines what a budget-friendly tennis shoe can offer—especially for older men who want casual comfort with a sporty edge. The Cloudfoam Comfort sockliner is the star here, delivering a cloud-like step-in feel that rivals much pricier models, making it perfect for all-day wear without foot fatigue. Built with a synthetic upper, it keeps weight low and resists scuffing, while the two-layer cushioning system combines softness with just enough rebound for light activity.

On pavement or indoor floors, these shoes feel surprisingly supportive for walking or standing, thanks to the soft midsole and breathable mesh lining. The rubber outsole provides dependable grip, though it lacks the multidirectional tread needed for aggressive court movements—this isn’t a shoe for serious tennis play. It’s better suited for light exercise, mall walking, or casual outings where comfort and appearance matter most. One downside: the arch support is minimal, so users with flat feet may need to swap in orthotics for all-day use.

When stacked against the CMNZHK model, the Grand Court 2.0 offers better material quality and brand reliability, despite a similar price point. Compared to the New Balance 806, it sacrifices support and durability but wins in style and immediate comfort. It’s the best budget-friendly option for older men who want a shoe that looks sharp, feels soft from day one, and supports light activity. While it doesn’t match the performance DNA of dedicated tennis models, it beats them in everyday wearability and eco-conscious design—thanks to its 20% recycled content.